Screen

Where all three methods agree

CAPE for value, the Piotroski F-Score for quality, Point & Figure for timing. A stock is flagged only when all three agree — any neutral, dissenting or unavailable leg yields Hold.

as of 2026-08-04 22:28 UTC
Buy
0
Sell
0
Analysed
503 / 505
Cannot signal
447

447 of 505 companies cannot produce a signal at all — 128 have fewer than ten years of usable earnings, and 83 have an F-Score criterion that cannot be determined. Under a unanimity rule a missing leg forces Hold, so these are excluded by data availability rather than by anything about the company. A further 2 could not be fetched from the data provider.

Two methods agree and the third is neutral. These are not signals — they are shown because unanimity is rare, and these are the names closest to it.

TickerPriceCAPE%ileValueF-ScoreQualityPoint & FigureTimingSignal
ALB102.0219.4236/9·Double Top Breakout
2 of 3
CIEN68.4730.651·7/9Double Top Breakout
2 of 3
HPE20.6720.3264/9·Double Top Breakout
2 of 3
MOS26.1611.357/9Rising column, no breakout·
2 of 3
MPC164.2617.9187/9Insufficient history·
2 of 3
NUE151.9112.677/9Rising column, no breakout·
2 of 3
SNPS539.9289.9923/9Rising column, no breakout·
2 of 3
SYF53.1510.227/9*·Double Top Breakout
2 of 3
A backtest of this rule did not find outperformance. Over 2012–2025, across 492 companies and 72,950 observations, stocks where all three methods agreed returned +1.73% over the following quarter against +3.72% for the average scanned stock — about two points worse. Sell signals did not fare better in the other direction. That period strongly favoured expensive growth companies, which a cheap-valuation screen excludes by design, so this is one market regime rather than a verdict on the method. But it is the evidence there is, and it does not support the strategy. How this was measured.

▲ bullish · ▼ bearish · · neutral · ○ not available. An asterisk on the F-Score marks an incomplete score, which forces the quality leg to neutral. Engine 2026.08.02-box6-momentum-accruals.