Screen
Where all three methods agree
CAPE for value, the Piotroski F-Score for quality, Point & Figure for timing. A stock is flagged only when all three agree — any neutral, dissenting or unavailable leg yields Hold.
as of 2026-08-05 22:28 UTC
Buy
6
Sell
0
Analysed
503 / 505
Cannot signal
139
139 of 505 companies cannot produce a signal at all — 131 have fewer than ten years of usable earnings, and 83 have an F-Score criterion that cannot be determined. Under a unanimity rule a missing leg forces Hold, so these are excluded by data availability rather than by anything about the company. A further 2 could not be fetched from the data provider.
| Ticker | Price | CAPE | %ile | Value | F-Score | Quality | Point & Figure | Timing | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELV | 417.89 | 21.8 | 25 | ▲ | 7/9 | ▲ | Double Top Breakout | ▲ | Buy |
| FITB | 57.16 | 16.2 | 11 | ▲ | 7/9 | ▲ | Double Top Breakout | ▲ | Buy |
| GL | 180.49 | 20.9 | 23 | ▲ | 8/9 | ▲ | Double Top Breakout | ▲ | Buy |
| MTB | 238.88 | 16.4 | 12 | ▲ | 8/9 | ▲ | Double Top Breakout | ▲ | Buy |
| STT | 170.69 | 22.1 | 27 | ▲ | 7/9 | ▲ | Double Top Breakout | ▲ | Buy |
| SWK | 91.90 | 15.5 | 8 | ▲ | 7/9 | ▲ | Double Top Breakout | ▲ | Buy |
A backtest of this rule did not find outperformance. Over 2012–2025, across 492 companies and 72,950 observations, stocks where all three methods agreed returned +1.73% over the following quarter against +3.72% for the average scanned stock — about two points worse. Sell signals did not fare better in the other direction. That period strongly favoured expensive growth companies, which a cheap-valuation screen excludes by design, so this is one market regime rather than a verdict on the method. But it is the evidence there is, and it does not support the strategy. How this was measured.
▲ bullish · ▼ bearish · · neutral · ○ not available. An asterisk on the F-Score marks an incomplete score, which forces the quality leg to neutral. Engine 2026.08.02-box6-momentum-accruals.